Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The N ≠ Nₑ Problem: A Foundational Error in Neutral Theory

Authors: Day, Vox; Athos, Claude;

The N ≠ Nₑ Problem: A Foundational Error in Neutral Theory

Abstract

Kimura's neutral theory rests on the theorem that the neutral substitution rate equals the mutation rate (k = μ), independent of population size. This result derives from a cancellation: 2Nμ mutations arise per generation, each with fixation probability 1/(2N), yielding k = μ. We demonstrate that this derivation contains a critical equivocation: the N in the mutation supply term represents census population size (individuals replicating DNA), while the N in the fixation probability derives from Wright-Fisher assumptions where it represents effective population size. For the cancellation to hold, census N must equal Ne—a condition violated by every natural population. In mammals, census populations exceed diversity-derived Ne by 19- to 46-fold. This error, present in both Kimura's 1968 Nature paper and his 1983 monograph, propagates into molecular clock calibrations, coalescent inference, and divergence time estimates across the tree of life.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback