
ABSTRACT:This study explores the dominant leadership styles among academic leaders in a private university in Bandung and their influence on administrative staff performance in the context of digital transformation. The research is grounded in the growing importance of adaptive, aluebased, and technologically driven leadership to support higher education institutions in facing the challenges of globalization and digitalization. Using a quantitative approach, the study surveyed 30 administrative staff from various faculties and academic departments. Data were collected through structured questionnaires that measured three dimensions of academic leadership: transformational, transactional, and digital leadership. Validity and reliability analyses confirmed that all items used in the instrument were statistically valid and internally consistent (Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.9). Descriptive results revealed that transformational leadership was the most dominant style perceived by respondents, characterized by visionary direction, inspirational motivation, integrity, and support for professional development. Although transactional and digital leadership also received positive responses, some gaps were identified, such as limited involvement in addressing internal issues and inconsistent application of digital strategies. Based on the findings, it is recommended that academic leaders strengthen strategic vision, promote innovation and technology use, provide fair evaluation systems, and enhance feedback mechanisms. Active involvement in professional development initiatives is also crucial to foster a collaborative and high-performing academic environment. This research contributes to the understanding of effective academic leadership and provides practical recommendations for institutional improvement in the digital era.
administrative effectiveness, digital leadership, transactional leadership, Higher education, academic leadership
administrative effectiveness, digital leadership, transactional leadership, Higher education, academic leadership
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
