Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DETERMINANTS OF ILLEGAL CRUDE OIL REFINING AND PERCEIVED HEALTH CONSEQUENCES ON THE RESIDENTS OF RIVERS EAST SENATORIAL DISTRICT, RIVERS STATE

Authors: Nduka Hope Adaobi;

DETERMINANTS OF ILLEGAL CRUDE OIL REFINING AND PERCEIVED HEALTH CONSEQUENCES ON THE RESIDENTS OF RIVERS EAST SENATORIAL DISTRICT, RIVERS STATE

Abstract

This study investigated the determinants and perceived health consequences of illegal crude oil refining in Rivers East Senatorial District, Nigeria. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional design. Eleven objectives, eleven research questions and four hypotheses guided the study. A sample of 393 respondents were drawn using a multistage sampling procedure. Data collection was done using a validated self-structured questionnaire with a Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.792. Data analysis was done in SPSS using descriptive statistics (percentage, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (z-test and ANOVA, and Post Hoc Bonferroni). It was found that poverty emerged as the most powerful driver (aggregate x̄= 3.05 ± 0.45), followed by corruption (x̄= 2.95 ± 0.50, high) and lack of knowledge (mean = 2.84 ± 0.49), with easy access to oil pipelines also rated as an important determinant (x̄= 2.74 ± 0.51), while non-implementation of MOUs was perceived as a relatively weak determinant (x̄= 2.57 ± 0.53). Perceived health consequences of ICOR were widely accepted, with an aggregate mean of 3.10 ± 0.40, especially for risks linked to harmful air pollutants, soot-related immune weakening, respiratory problems, eye symptoms, waterborne diseases and long-term conditions such as cancer and reduced life expectancy. Gender and income had a significant influence on perceived health consequences of illegal crude oil refining (p0.05). it was recommended among others that security agencies should co-create community patrols and anonymous reporting with youth associations using mapped hotspots, and body worn cameras, to deter sabotage, cut fire risk, and build trust

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research