Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AAA-02 - Behavior Is Not Agency: Why Acting Human Is Not the Same as Being Responsible

Authors: hn.cbp;

AAA-02 - Behavior Is Not Agency: Why Acting Human Is Not the Same as Being Responsible

Abstract

AAA-02- Behavior Is Not Agency. Contemporary algorithmic systems increasingly exhibit behavior that resembles human judgment: they recommend, classify, prioritize, optimize, and intervene across social, economic, and institutional domains. In public discourse, this behavioral similarity is frequently treated as evidence of agency or moral standing. This paper argues that such an inference constitutes a fundamental category error. The core claim is simple but structurally decisive: behavior is not agency, and performance is not responsibility. Historically, observable behavior functioned as a reliable proxy for agency because actions were tethered to identifiable human authors who could be questioned, sanctioned, and held accountable. Algorithmic systems sever this tether. They act pervasively while lacking a locus that can stand behind outcomes. This paper develops a structural account of responsibility under algorithmic mediation. It shows how decisions increasingly emerge from distributed pipelines spanning data collection, model design, institutional incentives, and interface constraints—while responsibility remains socially anchored to individuals who no longer control the decisive variables. Attempts to resolve this mismatch by attributing moral status or agency to systems themselves are shown to be a decoy: they displace attention from the institutional reconfiguration of agency rather than addressing it. The central risk diagnosed is not the rise of artificial moral agents, nor the arrival of machine consciousness. It is the normalization of action without ownership—a condition in which decisions persist, consequences bind, yet no agent remains structurally positioned to bear responsibility. The paper situates this failure as a foundational problem for ethics, governance, and political legitimacy in algorithmically mediated societies. AAA-02 establishes the core analytical distinction upon which the Agency in the Age of Algorithms series is built and provides the conceptual groundwork for subsequent analyses of delegation, intent, punishment, and the illusion of choice. Upcoming: PFS-03 – Capital Concentration and the Geography of Innovation (03 Feb) Upcoming: Delegation Is Not Distribution - Agency After Interruptibility - Essay 1 (05 Feb) Upcoming: AAA-03 – Human-AI Hybridity Is Not New. Whats New Is the Disappearance of Accountability (12 Feb)

Keywords

hn.cbp, algorithmic systems, ethics of AI, agency, moral responsibility, responsibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!