Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Each time more and more, documents we create and handle are in a purely digital format, and we distribute many of them openly. This leads to proliferation and exchange of documents, the origin and authorship of which is often lost. On the other hand, and most importantly, the management of all information in these documents is done in an automated way: indexing, interconnections among documents, analysis, extraction of keywords... In all these processes, the presence of an identification of the author within the text, which is enough for the human reader, is hardly recognisable by the computerised systems and, hence, such information will be lost. This article shares a few suggestions about the chances we have of including this kind of information in our digital documents. The answer to these issues is what has been called metadata: information about information.
Republication of the article originally published in the University Education section of SEBBM Journal, issue 184, June 2015 (the Journal of the Spanish Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology). It is republished here after the journal's original website was taken down.
education, metadata, licence, authorship
education, metadata, licence, authorship
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts