
Fungal pigments are increasingly recognized as environmentally sustainable alternatives to synthetic dyes. However, their commercial utilization requires effective optimization. This study aimed to optimize pigment production by Penicillium purpurogenum using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD). Initial screening using a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approach identified pH, incubation temperature, and incubation time as critical factors affecting pigment yields. Dextrose and yeast extract were selected as the optimal carbon and nitrogen sources. A three-factor CCD comprising 20 experimental trials was conducted to evaluate the individual, quadratic, and interactive effects of these variables on the pigment production. The experimental data were well represented by a quadratic polynomial model, which was statistically significant (F = 13.49, p = 0.0002) and exhibited a high adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted R² = 0.8554). The analysis of variance revealed that pH exerted a significant linear effect on pigment production (p = 0.0308), whereas the quadratic terms pH² (p < 0.0001) and temperature² (p = 0.0010) were highly significant, indicating pronounced curvature effects. Response surface analysis demonstrated that the interaction between pH and temperature had the most substantial impact on pigment yield, whereas the interaction between temperature and incubation time had minimal effect. Numerical optimization indicated that maximum pigment production could be achieved under conditions of near-neutral pH, moderate incubation temperature, and intermediate incubation time, which was experimentally validated with results closely aligned with the predictions.
Response surface methodology, Central composite model, Fungal pigment, Optimization process, Submerged fermentation
Response surface methodology, Central composite model, Fungal pigment, Optimization process, Submerged fermentation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
