Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

"Rectors for a Day": A Bottom-Up Policy Vision for the Post-Pandemic University

Authors: Montanari, Marco; Martínez de Carnero Calzada, Fernando;

"Rectors for a Day": A Bottom-Up Policy Vision for the Post-Pandemic University

Abstract

Post-pandemic higher education policy has largely followed a top-down, techno-centric logic, often overlooking the strategic knowledge accumulated by faculty during Emergency Remote Teaching. This qualitative pilot study proposes a bottom-up policy perspective by asking university instructors to imagine themselves as “Rectors for a day” and articulate their priorities for institutional reform. Using a participatory policy analysis and scenario-based inquiry, the study analyzes responses from a purposive sample of five professors across Southern Europe. Contrary to prevailing institutional agendas, faculty do not prioritize new technologies or infrastructure. Instead, a coherent policy vision emerges around three pillars: structural flexibility, protected time for pedagogical redesign, and assessment reform. Respondents emphasize that meaningful digital and hybrid innovation is impossible without workload recognition, reduced bureaucratic rigidity, and institutional validation of alternative assessment models. The findings suggest that post-pandemic resilience depends less on further technological investment than on governance reforms that enable faculty agency and pedagogical sustainability. Although exploratory, the study demonstrates the value of distributed leadership and practitioner-informed policy design, offering a strategic hypothesis for rethinking university governance in the post-pandemic era.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average