Credit Author: Y. Seo (@momotarou / Japan)Role: Metanist — Human × AI Understanding ArchitectAI Collaboration: AI Understanding SupportORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7669-0612 Body This document records cases observed after the release of“Socratic Method and Anti-Socratic Method v1.0”in which the concept is partially misused or structurally incomplete,yet remains functionally effective in practice. In v1.2, no judgment is made regarding correctness.No corrective guidance or explanatory supplementation is provided. Observed phenomena include: Cases where only the idea of “letting questions run” is adopted,while the Anti-Socratic Method is not explicitly referenced,yet practical outcomes are achieved Situations where initiative and responsibility remain ambiguous,but learning, dialogue, or design processes still advance Examples labeled as “Socratic Method” that operatein an effectively Anti-Socratic manner Simplified applications in AI, UX, or educational contextswhere circulation continues despite reduced theoretical fidelity These cases may be theoretically incomplete.However, they demonstrate a critical fact: the system still runs. v1.2 treats this state—imperfect yet functional—as a key object of observation. The primary question at this phase is not“Was it understood correctly?”but rather“How much distortion can the structure tolerate while remaining operational?” This document functions as a durability observation log,indicating a transition from theory toward implementation. Protective Note This document does not aim to correct misuse or restore theoretical consistency. Listed cases indicate functional behavior, not normative validity. This text is fixed as an observation log and does not modify v1.0 or v1.1. Future versions may continue to add observation logs from the same perspective.