Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Persistence of Tradition vs. The Hybrid Aspiration: A Longitudinal Analysis of Faculty Teaching Preferences (2022–2025)

Authors: Perone, Simona; Grammatikou, Mary; Hernando García-Cervigón, Alberto; Montanari, Marco;

The Persistence of Tradition vs. The Hybrid Aspiration: A Longitudinal Analysis of Faculty Teaching Preferences (2022–2025)

Abstract

The post-pandemic transition in higher education has been characterized by a tension between the persistence of traditional face-to-face teaching and growing faculty interest in hybrid models. This study examines how faculty teaching preferences evolved between 2022 and 2025 within Southern and Mediterranean European universities. Using a longitudinal comparative design, the analysis contrasts a large-scale faculty survey conducted in 2022 (N = 266) with a targeted follow-up probe in 2025 (N = 12). The 2022 data show an overwhelming return to face-to-face instruction (79.8%), accompanied by strong rejection of online assessment, reflecting technostress and institutional isomorphic pressures following Emergency Remote Teaching. By 2025, while most faculty report teaching in a “face-to-face with digital support” configuration due to institutional mandates, a majority express a preference for hybrid teaching if constraints were removed. Drawing on technostress theory and institutional isomorphism, the findings reveal a persistent policy gap between faculty aspirations and enforced teaching practices, suggesting that post-pandemic stagnation is driven less by faculty resistance than by institutional restoration dynamics.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average