Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

From Crisis to Polarization: A Longitudinal Analysis of Student Learning Preferences in Southern Europe (2022-2025)

Authors: Pantazatos, Dimitris; Hernando García-Cervigón, Alberto; Oliva Teles, Rui;

From Crisis to Polarization: A Longitudinal Analysis of Student Learning Preferences in Southern Europe (2022-2025)

Abstract

The digital transformation of higher education in Southern Europe has largely been interpreted through a provider-centric lens, emphasizing faculty concerns during the Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) phase. This study adopts a receiver-centric perspective, examining how student priorities evolved from the crisis period (2022/23) to the post-emergency context (2025). The analysis compares two independent cross-sectional cohorts (N=70 each) collected with comparable instruments: a heterogeneous European sample during ERT and a follow-up cohort concentrated in Italy and Greece. Results indicate a clear normalization of online assessment, with dissatisfaction declining from 88.5% in 2022/23 to moderate acceptance in 2025 (mean satisfaction 3.2/5). More importantly, the 2025 cohort reveals a polarized preference structure, with students divided between improving asynchronous pre-recorded content (~40%) and increasing synchronous interaction (~35%), while assessment fairness and support emerge as secondary concerns. Interpreted through the Community of Inquiry framework, these findings suggest that the post-ERT challenge is no longer assessment legitimacy but pedagogical design under heterogeneous demand, calling for flexible, mode-equivalent institutional strategies rather than uniform solutions.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average