
The digital transformation of higher education in Southern Europe has largely been interpreted through a provider-centric lens, emphasizing faculty concerns during the Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) phase. This study adopts a receiver-centric perspective, examining how student priorities evolved from the crisis period (2022/23) to the post-emergency context (2025). The analysis compares two independent cross-sectional cohorts (N=70 each) collected with comparable instruments: a heterogeneous European sample during ERT and a follow-up cohort concentrated in Italy and Greece. Results indicate a clear normalization of online assessment, with dissatisfaction declining from 88.5% in 2022/23 to moderate acceptance in 2025 (mean satisfaction 3.2/5). More importantly, the 2025 cohort reveals a polarized preference structure, with students divided between improving asynchronous pre-recorded content (~40%) and increasing synchronous interaction (~35%), while assessment fairness and support emerge as secondary concerns. Interpreted through the Community of Inquiry framework, these findings suggest that the post-ERT challenge is no longer assessment legitimacy but pedagogical design under heterogeneous demand, calling for flexible, mode-equivalent institutional strategies rather than uniform solutions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
