
This working paper examines Shadow AI and prompt injection as systemic governance and security challenges in enterprise AI adoption. It argues that the proliferation of unsanctioned and embedded AI capabilities, combined with unresolved vulnerabilities such as indirect prompt injection and RAG poisoning, represents a sociotechnical failure rather than a purely technical one. The paper provides a risk-based, governance-first framework tailored for CISOs, enterprise architects, AI governance boards, and policymakers. It explicitly acknowledges the limits of technical prevention and emphasizes architectural controls, observability, incident response, and human-in-the-loop safeguards. Key contributions include analysis of irreversible data leakage via model training, SaaS-driven “Shadow AI by default,” AI observability trade-offs, and operational concepts such as vector database hygiene and skeptical resilience. This document is intended as a decision-ready reference for enterprise AI governance and may be updated as practices, standards, and regulatory guidance evolve.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
