Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

From Self-Check to Reflection: Tools for Individual and Institutional Self-Awareness [Technical Document]

Authors: Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa; Crudele, Francesca;

From Self-Check to Reflection: Tools for Individual and Institutional Self-Awareness [Technical Document]

Abstract

This record presents the technical document for the ETH-TECH Self-Reflection Tool, developed as part of Work Package 2 (WP2) of the ETH-TECH project. Originally conceived as self-check tools, the project output evolved into self-reflection tools designed to provide an interoperable structure to self-assess one's position relative to European ethical guidelines for Artificial Intelligence (AI). The tool aims to foster awareness, critical thinking, and practical application of these ethical principles, especially in areas that are less familiar or more challenging to implement. Beyond encouraging personal and institutional reflection on AI ethics, it seeks to transform abstract guidelines into actionable insights, supporting an ethical and responsible approach to AI adoption and development in education. Hosted on the ETH-TECH project website (ETH-TECH Self-Reflection Tool), this interactive resource consists of five main components: The European Commission’s Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI – provides key concepts, keywords, and linked explanations to enhance understanding. How to Use the Self-Reflection Tools—introduces the tool and guides users step-by-step through the reflection process. How to Read Reports and Graphs—offers instructions for interpreting visualizations to deepen understanding and strengthen ethical awareness. Individual Self-Reflection—focuses on personal beliefs, practices, and ethical attitudes. Institutional Self-Reflection—focuses on organizational policies, strategies, and responsibilities. Each section is structured around the dimensions of the EU ethical guidelines and is followed by comparative reports and visual outputs that aggregate data from other participants. These features enable users to benchmark their responses, support reflection, and identify areas for potential improvement. Developed on the Qualtrics platform, the tool is available in six partner languages: Italian, English, Romanian, German, Spanish, and Catalan. The Zenodo record includes a technical document that provides: An introduction to the Self-Reflection Tool; Detailed descriptions of the Individual and Institutional tools, including screenshots and explanations of each section; Presentation of the generated reports; Preliminary results from testing sessions using the Individual tool, with initial analysis and reflections. This project deliverable is the result of joint collaboration between all project partners, who contributed through iterative feedback, user testing, and linguistic review. Final document authored by the UNIPD team (Work Package Leader). All materials included are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license. This applies to all files contained within the record, unless otherwise specified. Users may share and adapt the materials for non-commercial purposes only, giving appropriate credit to the original authors.

Keywords

technical document, ethical awareness, self reflection tool, ethics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities