
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) have the potential to transform rural communities, regional development, and urban–rural relations. As active entities that redistribute agency among humans and machines, AI and related technologies will shape how people, institutions, and machines interact and influence rural futures. Drawing on classical sociological theory and contemporary debates, LLMs are conceptualized as a form of synthetic social capital, offering rural residents access to the vast reservoir of global human knowledge while simultaneously threatening to erode tacit expertise and local cultural systems. It is important to monitor and evaluate the impact of AI in general and LLMs in particular on all aspects of rural life, including but not limited to rural labor markets, service provision and municipal capacity, the value and circulation of knowledge, social relations, cohesion, and cultural life, and sustainability and justice in resource use. These dynamics place AI at the center of struggles between empowerment and exclusion, peripherality and connection, surveillance and solidarity. The imagined utopias and dystopias of AI futures are not technological inevitabilities but may help us focus on alternative futures that must be actively imagined, debated, and pursued. This is a preprint which has not undergone peer review. A revised version is intended for submission to a peer-reviewed journal.
AI and society, social capital, digital transformation, rural sociology, artificial intelligence, rural development
AI and society, social capital, digital transformation, rural sociology, artificial intelligence, rural development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
