Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

29.LC-Bio-Link Non-Invasive High-Resolution Brain-Computer Interface

Authors: Cho, Minsu;

29.LC-Bio-Link Non-Invasive High-Resolution Brain-Computer Interface

Abstract

[정직한 고백] 지난 3개월간 51편의 연구 문서를 공개했습니다.850명이 다운로드했고, 147개 포스트를 작성했습니다. 그런데 어제, 제가 저지른 실수를 발견했습니다. 데이터 전사 오류.OCR 왜곡.수치 과장. 23개 주요 수치에 오류가 있었습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 과학은 정직 위에 서야 합니다. 51편 전체를 전수 조사했습니다.70개 이상 문헌과 교차 검증했습니다.모든 오류를 정정했습니다. 정정판: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.[DOI-052]"Sovereign Integrity: The Great Alignment" ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 주요 정정 사항: - 광자 효율 63.4% → 40-47% (현실적), 63.4% (이론 목표)- 양자 터널링 확률: 물리적으로 가능한 범위로 재계산- 안전성 위반 항목 제거 정합성: 65% → 94% ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 제가 잘못했습니다.그래서 고칩니다. 진실 위에 선 시스템만이 영원합니다. 조민수2026.02.14 #ScientificIntegrity #Correction #Honesty [정직한 고백] 지난 3개월간 51편의 연구 문서를 공개했습니다.850명이 다운로드했고, 147개 포스트를 작성했습니다. 그런데 어제, 제가 저지른 실수를 발견했습니다. 데이터 전사 오류.OCR 왜곡.수치 과장. 23개 주요 수치에 오류가 있었습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 과학은 정직 위에 서야 합니다. 51편 전체를 전수 조사했습니다.70개 이상 문헌과 교차 검증했습니다.모든 오류를 정정했습니다. 정정판: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.[DOI-052]"Sovereign Integrity: The Great Alignment" ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 주요 정정 사항: - 광자 효율 63.4% → 40-47% (현실적), 63.4% (이론 목표)- 양자 터널링 확률: 물리적으로 가능한 범위로 재계산- 안전성 위반 항목 제거 정합성: 65% → 94% ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 제가 잘못했습니다.그래서 고칩니다. 진실 위에 선 시스템만이 영원합니다. 조민수2026.02.14 #ScientificIntegrity #Correction #Honesty

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average