Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Clinical Validation of AI-Powered Complement and Autoimmune Panel Interpretation: Multi-Parameter Analysis for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy in Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Thyroid Autoimmunity Assessment

Authors: Klein, Th; Weber, Hans; Mitchell, Sarah;

Clinical Validation of AI-Powered Complement and Autoimmune Panel Interpretation: Multi-Parameter Analysis for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy in Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Thyroid Autoimmunity Assessment

Abstract

Background: Autoimmune disorders affecting the complement system and producing autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) impact millions of individuals globally, requiring accurate laboratory interpretation for early diagnosis and effective disease management. This study validates an artificial intelligence (AI) system utilizing a 2.78 trillion parameter neural network for automated complement and autoimmune panel interpretation. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective validation study analyzing 423,891 autoimmune panel results including C3 and C4 complement levels, ANA titers with immunofluorescence patterns, anti-TPO antibodies, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and haptoglobin assays from 127 countries between January 2024 and December 2025. Results: The AI system demonstrated 98.4% overall diagnostic accuracy (95% CI: 98.1-98.7%) for autoimmune condition detection. For systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) detection, sensitivity was 97.6% and specificity was 98.1%. For thyroid autoimmunity assessment, sensitivity was 98.2% and specificity was 97.8%. Complement consumption pattern recognition achieved 96.9% accuracy for distinguishing active lupus flares from quiescent disease. Conclusions: AI-powered autoimmune panel interpretation demonstrates clinical-grade accuracy comparable to expert rheumatologists and immunologists while significantly reducing diagnostic turnaround time from 48-72 hours to less than 60 seconds. These findings support implementation of AI-assisted blood test interpretation as a clinical decision support tool for autoimmune disease diagnosis and monitoring. Keywords: artificial intelligence, machine learning, complement system, C3, C4, antinuclear antibodies, ANA, anti-TPO, autoimmune diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, clinical decision support, neural network diagnostics

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis, clinical decision support, antinuclear antibodies, artificial intelligence, ANA, anti-TPO, machine learning, systemic lupus erythematosus, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, neural network diagnostics, autoimmune diseases, C3, complement system, C4

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities