
This joint statement, submitted by representatives of ERA Forum Stakeholder Group 4 (AERG, Eurodoc, ISE, and MCAA), welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to introduce an ERA Act as a key step toward strengthening Europe’s research and innovation ecosystem, reducing fragmentation, and improving EU global competitiveness. It stresses that the long-term legitimacy and success of the Act depend on meaningful and systematic stakeholder involvement through inclusive ERA governance. The statement calls for sustained and enforceable public investment in research and development, highlighting the need for binding national commitments to reach the 3% GDP R&D target, including at least 11.25% GDP in public R&D funding. It supports greater alignment of R&I policies across Member States while protecting bottom-up, excellence-based programmes such as the European Research Council (ERC) and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA). It also proposes that the ERA Act strengthen academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and transparent governance, including the creation of an independent European ombudsperson for academic freedom. The document emphasizes gender equality, inclusive career structures, secure employment standards, and improved mobility conditions (including social security access and reduced administrative burdens). Finally, it advocates for open science, improved research assessment practices, trusted research infrastructures, and balanced knowledge valorisation beyond commercialisation, concluding that the ERA Act can significantly enhance Europe’s scientific and societal impact.
Era Act, Research policy, European Commission, European Research Area
Era Act, Research policy, European Commission, European Research Area
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
