Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Advancing Health Equity through the Translational Science Benefits Model: A Framework Update

Authors: Casey, Shannon;

Advancing Health Equity through the Translational Science Benefits Model: A Framework Update

Abstract

The attached poster was presented at the 18th Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health in Washington DC, December 15, 2025. This represents the work of a large team of researchers from Washington University in St. Louis, the creators of the Translational Science Benefits Model, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison who assisted with the community member integration phase. Background: As health disparities grow more apparent, especially considering recent global events, the need to embed equity into healthcare research and delivery is urgent. Addressing these inequities requires not just better interventions, but better ways to measure their impact. We updated the Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM), the most widely used impact evaluation framework among CTSA Program awardees, to bring health equity to the forefront by incorporating comprehensive equity-focused benefits. Methods: To update the framework, the TSBM team reviewed the framework for existing equity elements, conducted a literature search, and partnered with researchers and community members (from Washington University in St. Louis and the University of Wisconsin). Community members joined three listening sessions to co-develop proposed equity concepts. Literature and session findings were synthesized into draft benefit additions, which were iteratively reviewed for clarity and relevance. Findings: We reviewed 58 peer-reviewed articles and four gray literature sources, selecting 15 for full analysis. Findings informed sessions with community groups in Madison and St. Louis. From these discussions, we synthesized key themes—trust, power, and access—which guided the iterative development of 10 equity-focused benefits. Madison community members reviewed and supported the final set, which reflects both literature and community insights. Presenting Author: Douglas Luke, PhD, Washington University in St. Louis

Related Organizations
Keywords

Health Equity, Clinical and Translational Research, Translational Science, Translational Science Benefits Model

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average