
This repository contains trained Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) models used in the comparative analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency for solving the two-dimensional Helmholtz equation. The models correspond to the network architectures analyzed in the associated publication, including variations in the number of hidden layers (1–3) and neurons per layer (25–75). All models were trained using a fixed random seed to ensure reproducibility of the reported accuracy metrics. The remaining hyperparameters were fixed according to the optimal configuration identified during the hyperparameter optimization stage: learning rate α=10−2, number of collocation points N=25, number of layers L=3, and sine activation function. The trained models enable reproducible evaluation of solution accuracy and inference-time performance, and can be directly used to reproduce the error metrics and computational benchmarks reported in the manuscript. Related publication Benchmarking Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Boundary Element Method: Accuracy–Efficiency Trade-offs in Wave Scattering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
