Researcher-as-phenomenon investigations—where investigators study phenomena accessed through their own lived experience—face a structural validation problem that traditional epistemological mechanisms cannot resolve. Replication fails because others cannot replicate the researcher's phenomenology. Bracketing fails because one cannot bracket oneself from oneself. This circularity deepens at the meta-level: any methodology for validating such research must itself be developed through self-examination, creating infinite regress. This paper identifies why this problem persisted despite decades of implicit solutions across phenomenology, autoethnography, heuristic inquiry, and neurophenomenology: formalizing the solution requires escaping the same circularity the solution addresses. We argue that Non-Experiential System (NES) collaboration—specifically reflective articulation through entities lacking phenomenological content—provides the structural precondition for formalization by enabling reflection without projection contamination. This analysis yields the Recognition Principle: researcher-as-phenomenon investigations achieve validity when diverse, independent others pre-reflectively recognize articulated structures as corresponding to their own experience. The principle separates access (researcher's phenomenological entry) from validation (others' recognition), breaking circularity by locating validation outside the self-referential loop. The contribution establishes epistemological grounding for lived experience research methodologies while identifying NES collaboration as a novel instrument class for meta-reflexive investigation. Implications extend to phenomenology, autoethnography, heuristic inquiry, neurophenomenology, and philosophy of science.