Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Measuring the Immeasurable: A Framework for Organizational Ambidexterity and Intellectual Capital

Authors: Mahmood, Dr. Tarique; Ali, Dr.Liaqat; Ahmad, Dr. Mehboob; Asif, Dr. Muhammad; Khan, Dr. Mubashir Ali;

Measuring the Immeasurable: A Framework for Organizational Ambidexterity and Intellectual Capital

Abstract

The study focuses on the fusion of organizational ambidexterity and intellectual capital and proposes a construct to measure ambidextrous intellectual capital (AIC). We argue that ambidextrous learning is derived from intellectual capital architectures that underlie unique configurations of human, relational, and structural capital. A threefold approach was adopted to develop the AIC scale. Initially, 501 sub-dimensions of IC were identified through a literature review. In the second stage, a preliminary survey was conducted among 90 selected experts to identify the most relevant dimensions and sub-dimensions of AIC. Among the 501 identified dimensions of intellectual capital, 12 dimensions of HC, 10 dimensions of RC, and 10 dimensions of SC were selected using the mean value criterion. In the last stage, statements were generated with both dimensions of ambidexterity in mind, i.e., exploitation and exploration. The developed constructs to gauge AIC—Intellectual Capital with Organizational Ambidexterity—were reviewed by experts to determine whether the generated statements accurately captured the main idea. After incorporating experts’ feedback, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted using data from 548 respondents. The results were obtained from the AIC questionnaire, which comprised 91 items. The developed questionnaire can be used to measure an organization's AIC. Keywords - Organizational ambidexterity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average