
The question this study addressed. This direct observation study at the Mimboman Health Centre analyzes technical compliance during 50 actual tests. It breaks down every step, from capillary puncture to final interpretation and waste disposal. What the study adds to our knowledge. The study quantifies an alarming error burden: 275 mistakes for only 50 tests. The major finding is the massive concentration of failures (72%) during the analytical phase, particularly a near-systematic failure to respect reading times (80%). It reveals that the absence of on-site written protocols (98%) is the primary driver of these errors, far more than individual incompetence. This publication is available in full in Health Sciences and Disease.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
