
Background: Healthcare quality improvement (HQI) has emerged as a critical global priority aimed at enhancing patient safety, clinical outcomes, and system efficiency. Despite substantial investments, variability in care delivery and patient outcomes persists across healthcare settings. Objective: The present study aims to examine contemporary approaches to healthcare quality improvement, identify key determinants influencing quality outcomes, and assess evidence- based strategies for sustainable improvement. Methods: A descriptive and analytical review design was adopted. Peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science from 2015–2024 were systematically reviewed. Studies focusing on quality frameworks, patient safety, performance indicators, and improvement interventions were included. Results: Findings indicate that multimodal quality improvement strategies—integrating leadership engagement, data-driven decision-making, workforce training, and patient-centered care—significantly enhance healthcare outcomes. Digital health tools and continuous quality improvement models further strengthen monitoring and accountability. Conclusion: Effective healthcare quality improvement requires a systems-based approach supported by strong governance, continuous evaluation, and stakeholder participation. Future initiatives should emphasize scalability, digital integration, and context-specific adaptation.
Healthcare quality, patient safety, quality improvement, healthcare systems, evidence-based practice
Healthcare quality, patient safety, quality improvement, healthcare systems, evidence-based practice
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
