
Abstract Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether cracks observed post-orthodontic treatment occur during bracket removal, if pre-existing cracks progress, or whether the normal lifestyle of untreated individuals causes more enamel cracks. Materials and Methods: The study included 54 individuals (27 experimental/treated, 27 control/untreated) with 216 upper incisors. Intraoral photographs were taken for the experimental group immediately before and after debonding, and for the control group at baseline and after 1 year. Photographs were captured using camera with macro lens and standardized settings (ISO 3200, F22, 1/160) with a polarizing lens and transillumination device. Crack lengths were measured using ImageJ software. Statistical analyses (Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, Chi-square tests; p0.05). While crack counts remained unchanged in the experimental group pre-/post-debonding (p>0.05), the control group exhibited increased cracks after 1 year (p<0.05). Conclusion: Orthodontic debonding with appropriate techniques does not significantly increase enamel crack formation. Functional stresses and parafunctional habits are primary contributors to crack progression.
Enamel Crack, Bracket Debonding, Dental Photograph.
Enamel Crack, Bracket Debonding, Dental Photograph.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
