
College students worldwide face a rising burden of mental health challenges. AI-based mental health applications (including chatbots, adaptive self-help modules, and predictive mood trackers) are increasingly used to offer scalable support. However, successful deployment depends on aligning these technologies with student needs.This systematic literature review synthesizes qualitative evidence (2020–2025) regarding the needs, preferences, and concerns of college students using AI-based mental health applications. Five primary themes emerged: (1) personalization and adaptability; (2) privacy and confidentiality; (3) accessibility and usability; (4) emotional support and human-like interaction; and (5) integration with campus ecosystems. Students emphasized transparent data practices, co-design approaches, culturally sensitive content, and pathways connecting digital tools with campus counseling services. Gaps included limited longitudinal evidence, underrepresentation of low- and middle-income contexts, and little attention to intersectional differences. Designing AI-based mental health applications for college students requires centering student voices through participatory design, prioritizing privacy and explainability, and integrating digital supports with institutional services. Future research should include longitudinal, cross-cultural, and intersectional studies to assess sustained engagement and clinical impact.
rtificial Intelligence, Digital Mental Health, College Students, Qualitative Findings, User Needs, Systematic Review, rtificial Intelligence, Digital Mental Health, College Students, Qualitative Findings, User Needs, Systematic Review
rtificial Intelligence, Digital Mental Health, College Students, Qualitative Findings, User Needs, Systematic Review, rtificial Intelligence, Digital Mental Health, College Students, Qualitative Findings, User Needs, Systematic Review
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
