
Listening is one of the most challenging skills for ESL learners, often underemphasized in instruction and lacking strong pedagogical support. While digital tools offer new opportunities for authentic listening practice, their effectiveness is inconsistent without structured guidance. This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study investigated the impact of technology-assisted, strategy-based listening instruction on 96 adult ESL learners, divided into a control group (traditional textbook instruction) and an experimental group using Ed Puzzle, TED-Ed, and ELSA Speak within a structured three-phase model: pre-task, during-task, and post-task reflection. Quantitative results showed significantly greater gains in the experimental group, especially in inferential comprehension, with large effect sizes. Qualitative findings from journals and focus groups indicated enhanced learner autonomy, increased metacognitive strategy use, and reduced listening anxiety. These outcomes suggest that when digital tools are embedded within a coherent instructional framework, they can substantially improve both listening performance and learner experience. The study contributes to the field of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) by emphasizing the importance of pedagogical integration, strategy instruction, and reflective learning in designing effective ESL listening instruction
ESL Listening Comprehension, Ed Puzzle, Mixed-Methods Research, Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL), Strategy-Based Instruction
ESL Listening Comprehension, Ed Puzzle, Mixed-Methods Research, Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL), Strategy-Based Instruction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
