
This work should be read neither as a theory of modeling nor as a methodological proposal. It is not a framework, not a computational program, and not a contribution to applied modeling. De Limite Modellationis articulates a philosophical position on the ethical and structural limits of modeling. It examines modeling not as a neutral instrument of representation, but as an operation of substitution that may become illegitimate when it exceeds its right to operate. The book identifies points at which modeling no longer preserves structure but replaces it—where continuation degrades precision, silence is denied legitimacy, and lived constraint is overwritten by formal adequacy. This work refuses system-building, exemplification, and integration. It offers no synthesis and no closure.
Epistemic Limits, Ethics of Modeling, Formalization, Over-Modeling, Philosophical Position, Limit of Modeling, Silence, AI Ethics, Neuroscience (Conceptual), Power and Representation
Epistemic Limits, Ethics of Modeling, Formalization, Over-Modeling, Philosophical Position, Limit of Modeling, Silence, AI Ethics, Neuroscience (Conceptual), Power and Representation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
