
Se expone que el diálogo jurisprudencial surge por la globalización y la difusión de ideas judiciales, impulsando la cross-fertilization entre sistemas jurídicos. Se expone que ese diálogo no implica la conformidad internacional, sino la consideración de criterios. Además, se clasifican modalidades de análisis de jurisprudencia ajena y distingue diálogo vertical y horizontal.
diálogo jurisprudencial; comunicación transjudicial; tipologías; derechos humanos; TEDH
diálogo jurisprudencial; comunicación transjudicial; tipologías; derechos humanos; TEDH
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
