
This video presents a concise overview of the January 2026 analysis showing that baryonic back-reaction cannot account for the observed late-time growth plateau γ ≈ 0.63. Drawing on Euclid SC8, DESI DR2, X-ray and SZ gas-fraction constraints, and state-of-the-art numerical simulations, it explains why baryonic feedback—although essential at small scales—lacks the magnitude, scale-independence, and redshift invariance required to reproduce the plateau. The results highlight the need for a structural, non-baryonic mechanism governing late-time cosmic growth.
baryonic feedback; baryonic back-reaction; γ≈0.63; late-time growth suppression; Euclid SC8; DESI DR2; structure formation; cosmic shear; weak lensing; ΛCDM tensions; S₈ tension; modified gravity; dynamical dark energy; retentive cosmology; Λψ
baryonic feedback; baryonic back-reaction; γ≈0.63; late-time growth suppression; Euclid SC8; DESI DR2; structure formation; cosmic shear; weak lensing; ΛCDM tensions; S₈ tension; modified gravity; dynamical dark energy; retentive cosmology; Λψ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
