Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Review of Generalization in Additive Manufacturing Optimization

Authors: Khalid, Muhammad Waleed; Abbasi, Taimoor;

A Review of Generalization in Additive Manufacturing Optimization

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has transitioned from prototyping to functionalpart production across aerospace, biomedical, automotive, energy,tooling, and consumer sectors. However, achieving consistent part qualityremains challenging due to the strong sensitivity of AM processes to a multitudeof interdependent parameters. Over the past decade, thousands ofstudies have optimized process parameters for specific materials, machines,and geometries. Yet, these optimized solutions overwhelmingly lack generalizability:parameters that yield good results on one machine, geometry, AMtechnology, or material often fail when transferred to another context.This review provides the first unified, cross-technology examination ofthe generalizability problem in AM process-parameter optimization. Wesynthesize evidence from polymer, metal, and ceramic AM processes includingFused Filament Fabrication (FFF), Stereolithography (SLA), SelectiveLaser Sintering (SLS), Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF/SLM), ElectronBeam Melting (EBM), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and binderjetting. The review identifies root causes of non-generalizability, includingmachine-to-machine variation, material thermal and rheological inconsistency,geometry-scaling effects, environmental sensitivity, multiscale multiphysicsinteractions, and the lack of standardized benchmark datasets.We critically evaluate optimization approaches ranging from design of experiments(DOE) and regression models to machine learning (ML), deeplearning, Bayesian optimization, simulation-driven optimization, and multifidelitymodelling. The evidence reveals that most models fit locally but failto transfer across new materials, geometries, and machines due to limiteddatasets, local search spaces, and insufficient physics incorporation. Emergingdirections such as meta-learning, transfer learning, physics informed machinelearning, multi-fidelity data fusion, closed-loop control, and digitaltwins are proposed as pathways toward generalized, scalable optimization.The review concludes by outlining research gaps that must be overcome forAM to achieve fully autonomous, machine independent, quality assured manufacturing.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average