
Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) predicts nucleation rates in hard-sphere colloids that differ from experimental measurements by up to 22 orders of magnitude—the largest such discrepancy in condensed matter physics. Recent experiments (2025) have deepened the crisis, finding that the critical nucleus size remains constant independent of supersaturation, directly contradicting CNT predictions. We propose that this discrepancy has a geometric origin: CNT assumes spherical nuclei, but Frank demonstrated in 1952 that supercooled liquids exhibit icosahedral local order. Icosahedra cannot tile three-dimensional space, creating geometric frustration that CNT does not capture. Drawing on icosahedral geometry, we derive a parameter-free prediction: the nucleation barrier ratio ΔG*/Q* = e⁵/1640 ≈ 9%, where e⁵ is the icosahedral structure ratio. We show that the 22 orders of magnitude discrepancy arises from CNT missing this e⁵ factor at approximately four stages of the nucleation process, giving (e⁵)⁴ ≈ 10⁸–10⁹ as the core geometric error.
classical nucleation theory hard sphere colloids icosahedral order geometric frustration nucleation rate discrepancy Frank cluster 22 orders of magnitude CNT failure
classical nucleation theory hard sphere colloids icosahedral order geometric frustration nucleation rate discrepancy Frank cluster 22 orders of magnitude CNT failure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
