Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

EFFECT OF PROCESSED AND ULTRA-PROCESSED FOOD CONSUMPTION AND IRON PROFILE IN PREGNANT WOMEN

Authors: Rasha Saad Sharad*1, Bassam Francis Matti2;

EFFECT OF PROCESSED AND ULTRA-PROCESSED FOOD CONSUMPTION AND IRON PROFILE IN PREGNANT WOMEN

Abstract

This study was cross-sectional and examined the relationship between iron-index factors and the intake of processed (PF) and ultra-processed (UPF) foods in 100 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters and 100 non-pregnant women (as a control group) in Baghdad, Iraq. In addition to laboratory-based measurements of blood parameters (hemoglobin, MCV, serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, and TIBC), dietary consumption was evaluated twice using a 24-hour recall questionnaire and categorized using the NOVA system. The findings indicated that while there was no significant difference in the intake of ultra-processed meals (P=0.491), pregnant women consumed considerably more processed foods (mean 2.34 vs. 1.96; P=0.003). Correlation analyses showed the most startling finding: in both groups (pregnant and non-pregnant), there was a strong negative association (P=0.001) between the consumption of processed and ultra-processed foods and levels of hemoglobin, MCV, serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin. This was true even though there were no significant differences in iron marker variables (such as hemoglobin and ferritin) between the two groups (apart from elevated platelets (P=0.002) and WBC counts (P=0.006) in pregnant women). Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation (P=0.001) between the two groups' TIBC levels and the meals they consumed. The study comes to the conclusion that indices of iron storage (ferritin) and circulation iron (hemoglobin) are adversely correlated with greater intake of processed and ultra-processed meals.and significantly affects iron homeostasis in women of reproductive age, regardless of pregnancy status.

Keywords

processed foods, ultra-processed foods, iron, pregnant women, nutrition.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average