Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

PHORAGER - mining prophages from ESKAPE pathogens

Authors: Dyball, Xena; Ponsero, Alise Jany; Cook, Ryan; Adriaenssens, Evelien;

PHORAGER - mining prophages from ESKAPE pathogens

Abstract

ESKAPE pathogen prophage repertoire : PHORAGER output collection This archive contains the key prophage-mining outputs generated by PHORAGER (Prophage Hunting, vOTU Retrieval, Annotation and Genomic ExploRation) applied to a large collection of publicly available ESKAPE pathogen genomes. - Pipeline: PHORAGER v0.5.0-beta https://github.com/aponsero/PHORAGER- Associated manuscript: Defining the ESKAPE pathogen prophage repertoire with PHORAGER (Dyball et al. bioRXiv)- Generated by: the PHORAGER `bacterial`, `prophage`, `annotation`, and `summarize` workflows, run with default parameters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. What is in this archive The collection is split into one ZIP file per ESKAPE pathogen. Each ZIP unpacks to a single folder containing five files for that species: File (per species) Type Content PHORAGER stage _genomes_metadata.tsv TSV NCBI metadata for the input genomes external from NCBI _bacterial_genome.tsv TSV Per-genome QC metrics + prophage counts `summarize` (bacterial_genome) _filtered_phage_set.fasta FASTA (nt) Prophage sequences after annotation-based filtering, before dereplication `annotation` (post-filter) _final_representatives.fasta FASTA (nt) vOTU cluster representative prophages `annotation` (post-clustering) _prophage_table.tsv TSV Per-prophage table (host, cluster, quality, length, CDS) `summarize` (prophage_table) Species included (six ZIPs): - Enterococcus faecium- Staphylococcus aureus- Klebsiella pneumoniae- Acinetobacter baumannii- Pseudomonas aeruginosa- Enterobacter spp. Folder / file naming. Folders follow `_`, where the date is the NCBI download/build date for that species' genome set (these differ between species, e.g. most ESKAPE genomes were retrieved 10 Oct 2025, K. pneumoniae on 22 Oct 2025). Files within a folder are prefixed with the same `` token. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. File descriptions 2.1 `_genomes_metadata.tsv` : NCBI input metadata Tab-separated metadata for the bacterial genomes downloaded from NCBI and used as input to PHORAGER. This file is produced by the NCBI download step, not by PHORAGER. 2.2 `_bacterial_genome.tsv` : per-genome summary One row per genome that passed CheckM2 quality assessment. Columns (exact, as emittedby the pipeline): Column Description Genome_name Genome basename (from CheckM2 `Name`); matches the input genome filename stem (e.g. the NCBI accession) Completeness CheckM2 completeness estimate (%) Contamination CheckM2 contamination estimate (%) Genome_size Total assembly size (bp) GC_content GC fraction Contig_N50 Contig N50 (bp) Coding_sequences Total predicted CDS count Prophage_count Number of prophages attributed to this genome in `filtered_phage_set.fasta` (i.e. the filtered, pre-dereplication set). `0` if none passed filtering > Note: `Prophage_count` is derived from the filtered (non-dereplicated) prophage set,> by attributing each prophage to the genome named before the first `_ctg` in its ID. 2.3 `_filtered_phage_set.fasta` : filtered prophage sequences Nucleotide FASTA of all prophage sequences that passed PHORAGER's annotation-based filtering, before vOTU dereplication. Each record corresponds to exactly one row in `prophage_table.tsv` (matched on the sequence ID). Sequence-ID format is described in §3. 2.4 `_final_representatives.fasta` : vOTU representatives Nucleotide FASTA containing one representative sequence per vOTU cluster (95% ANI / 85% aligned fraction by default). These are extracted directly from `filtered_phage_set.fasta`, so every header here also appears in that file and equals a value in the `Cluster_representative` column of `prophage_table.tsv`. Use this file as the non-redundant, species-level prophage set for downstream analysis. 2.5 `_prophage_table.tsv` : per-prophage summary One row per prophage in `filtered_phage_set.fasta`. Columns (exact, as emitted): Column Description Prophage_name Prophage sequence ID; matches a header in `filtered_phage_set.fasta` Bacterial_host Host genome basename (everything before the first `_ctg` in `Prophage_name`); matches `Genome_name` in the bacterial table. Cluster_representative The vOTU representative for this prophage's cluster. If equal to `Prophage_name`, this prophage is a representative (and appears in `final_representatives.fasta`). `Not_in_clusters` if no cluster assignment was found. CheckV_quality CheckV quality tier (e.g. Complete / High-quality / Medium-quality). `NA` if not found in the CheckV summary. Phage_length Sequence length (bp). Uses CheckV's trimmed `proviral_length` where available, otherwise `contig_length`. CDS_number CDS count from the annotation step. `NA` if detailed annotation was skipped or the prophage was not matched. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. Prophage sequence-naming convention Input contigs are renamed by PHORAGER to `{genome_basename}_ctg{NNN}`, where `genome_basename` is the input genome's filename stem and `NNN` is a zero-padded contig number (3–5 digits, depending on contig count per genome). Prophage records then take one of two forms: - Coordinate-based (merged/consolidated predictions): `{genome_basename}_ctg{NNN}_{start}_{end}` Coordinates are 1-based and inclusive, relative to the renamed contig. Example: `GCF_000123456.1_ctg001_4521_38790`- Whole-contig predictions: `{genome_basename}_ctg{NNN}_complete` Used when a mining tool flagged the entire contig as prophage. CheckV may append a trailing `_1` to trimmed proviral sequences; where present, that suffix is part of the FASTA header and the `Prophage_name` value. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. How the files link together The four PHORAGER files share consistent identifiers, so they can be joined directly: - Prophage → host genome: `prophage_table.Bacterial_host` = `bacterial_genome.Genome_name`.- Prophage row → sequence: `prophage_table.Prophage_name` = FASTA header in `filtered_phage_set.fasta`.- Prophage → its vOTU representative: `prophage_table.Cluster_representative`; the representatives themselves are in `final_representatives.fasta`.- Genome → NCBI metadata: `bacterial_genome.Genome_name` = the accession column in `genomes_metadata.tsv` *(confirm which column — see §2.1)*. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. How these outputs were generated Genomes were processed with PHORAGER v0.5.0-beta using default parameters. In summary(see the associated manuscript for full methods and citations): 1. Bacterial QC & dereplication : CheckM2 quality filtering (default ≥90% completeness, <5% contamination) followed by dRep dereplication at the strain level (default 99.9% ANI).2. Prophage mining & consolidation : geNomad and VIBRANT run in parallel; overlapping predictions consolidated into non-redundant coordinate ranges; sequences extracted.3. Annotation & filtering : CheckV quality assessment; length/quality filtering; annotation with Pharokka (and Phold); structural-gene-based filtering. The `filtered_phage_set.fasta` is the output of this stage.4. vOTU clustering : BLAST + CheckV ANI scripts, clustered at the species level (default 95% ANI / 85% aligned fraction). `final_representatives.fasta` holds the cluster representatives.5. Summaries : `bacterial_genome.tsv` and `prophage_table.tsv`. Tool versions: Tool Version CheckM2 1.0.1 dRep 3.5.0 geNomad 1.8.1 VIBRANT 1.2.1 CheckV 1.0.3 Pharokka 1.9.1 Phold 0.2.0 BLAST+ 2.16.0

Keywords

prophages, phage, ESKAPE

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average