
The concepts of risk and uncertainty have long been used interchangeably, leading to confusion and undesired outcomes in decision making. Despite the extensive research in this field, the distinction between these terms and related constructs is often overlooked. In fact, a study by De Groot and Thurik (2018) revealed that 88.3% of articles did not adhere to this distinction, which has led to contaminated literature and erroneous conclusions. Thus, this paper aims to differentiate the concepts of risk and uncertainty and other related constructs, such as ambiguity and probability, in financial and managerial decision making. A conceptual and mathematical analysis is presented, supported by numerical applications. The focus is on risk, as it is directly related to the success or failure of decisions. By providing a clear understanding of these concepts, decision makers can better assess the degree of certainty, estimate the level of risk and uncertainty, and make informed decisions. This paper contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of related constructs in decision making, which can help avoid confusion and ensure more accurate theoretical and empirical findings
decision making, risk, uncertainty, ambiguity, probability, mathematical analysis, numerical applications, financial decisions, managerial decisions, conceptual analysis
decision making, risk, uncertainty, ambiguity, probability, mathematical analysis, numerical applications, financial decisions, managerial decisions, conceptual analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
