Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Self-Organizing Comparative-Advantage Slider Model of Role Distribution and Regulation in Romantic Dyads

Authors: Fröderberg, J. E.;

A Self-Organizing Comparative-Advantage Slider Model of Role Distribution and Regulation in Romantic Dyads

Abstract

A Self-Organizing Comparative-Advantage Slider Model of Role Distribution and Regulation in Romantic Dyads Description:This preprint presents a conceptual and formal framework for understanding how romantic dyads self-organize role distribution across multiple functional and regulatory domains (e.g., planning, emotional regulation, conflict repair, social coordination). The model treats domain-level role share as approximately zero-sum at a given time, while allowing relationship outcomes to remain positive-sum and collaborative. Building on interdependence theory, dyadic coping models, interpersonal emotion regulation, and vulnerability–stress–adaptation frameworks, the paper introduces a “slider” representation of emergent specialization based on comparative advantage and capacity constraints. A central theoretical contribution is the distinction between emergent role configurations and the misattribution of intent (agency), which can moralize asymmetry and amplify relational strain in tightly coupled dyads. The framework yields testable hypotheses for dyadic longitudinal, cross-sectional, and experimental designs (e.g., APIM, EMA, intervention studies), and includes operationalization suggestions and applied intervention analogs such as Slider Reframing Training (SRT). This preprint is intended for researchers and practitioners in personality and social psychology, relationship science, and behavioral regulation.

Keywords

interpersonal emotion regulation, agency attribution, comparative advantage, demand–withdraw, ecological momentary assessment, role distribution, mental load, dyadic coping, APIM, romantic dyads

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green