
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) compares the citation performance of a publication to the global average in its subject field, normalised for discipline, publication type, and year. An FWCI of 1.0 means the work is cited as expected, while values above or below 1.0 indicate higher or lower citation impact relative to the average. This metric is drawn from Scopus data. Watch this short video to find out what this metric is, how to use it, and where to find it.
metrics, responsible research assessment
metrics, responsible research assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
