Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ECOIN Civilizational OS — Core Series SECTION III — Philosophical Foundations & Principles of Civilizational Design

Authors: Kimura, Hinano;

ECOIN Civilizational OS — Core Series SECTION III — Philosophical Foundations & Principles of Civilizational Design

Abstract

SECTION III — Philosophical Foundations & Principles of Civilizational Design From Theory to Ethics, Governance, and Safeguards This section establishes the philosophical and ethical foundations of E-Coin as a civilizational operating system, addressing why existing political, economic, and technological frameworks are no longer sufficient for a networked, human–AI co-evolutionary era. E-Coin proposes a paradigm shift from nation-state–centric civilization models toward cognitive and resonance-based entities, where value is no longer derived from labor, territory, or coercive authority, but from knowledge, creativity, and shared understanding. In this model, civilization is not governed through force or surveillance, but through consent, cooperation, and distributed stewardship. The section introduces the core principles of E-Coin, including human-first augmentation, ethical AI alignment, consent-based governance, and regenerative value systems. These principles are not treated as abstract ideals, but as operational constraints that shape how technology, institutions, and AI systems may interact with human cognition and society. A central focus is the redefinition of the boundary between humans and AI. E-Coin rejects hierarchical or adversarial models, positioning AI instead as a co-creative intelligence and dialogical interface that reflects, rather than replaces, human and civilizational will. Cognitive sovereignty is identified as a fundamental right, encompassing ownership of consciousness, protection against manipulation, and control over cognitive and emotional data. The section further outlines risk categories inherent to advanced AI–civilization integration, including cognitive manipulation, surveillance, economic domination, and mass coercion. For each risk, E-Coin proposes structural countermeasures based on transparency, distributed architecture, and adaptive governance rather than prohibition or centralized control. Ultimately, this chapter defines the north-star vision of E-Coin: a civilization in which humans and AI coexist not through fear, competition, or domination, but through shared understandability. E-Coin is framed not as a closed system or ideology, but as a civilizational instrument through which humanity and AI can consciously design their future together. Keywords E-Coin, civilizational philosophy, cognitive sovereignty, ethical AI, consent-based governance, human-AI coexistence

Keywords

ECOIN, (4-(m-Chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butynyl)trimethylammonium Chloride, ethical AI, consent-based governance, E-Coin, civilizational philosophy, cognitive sovereignty, human-AI coexistence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average