
Since the historic announcement of cold fusion by Fleischmann and Pons in 1989, numerous experimental results have confirmed nuclear reactions in metals. However, the theoretical framework remains insufficient. To explain cold fusion in the palladium–deuterium system, I propose a fusion model induced by dislocation annihilation. Huizenga’s three miracles are resolved as the macroscopic force accompanying dislocation annihilation enables quasi-static fusion with atomic-scale confinement to overcome Coulomb repulsion, resulting in selective production of the thermally most stable nucleus, 4He. Furthermore, the reaction probability and excess heat generation are derived to be proportional to (D/Pd)^(14). The threshold deuterium loading ratio is calculated as 0.85, consistent with McKubre’s law. Thus, this framework provides not only qualitative insight into observed behaviors but also quantitative estimations of cold fusion phenomena. Finally, Paneth’s experimental results from the 1920s were reevaluated. The amount of helium predicted by my model strongly suggests that Paneth’s experimental observations were indeed correct as the earliest excellent proof for cold fusion.
Paneth, dislocation, Storms, D-D fusion, dislocation annihilation, solid-state nuclear fusion, cold fusion, Miles, helium, Hagelstein, palladium, Lawson criterion, Huizenga's three miracles, atomic-scale confinement, LENR, McKubre, Fleischmann-Pons effect, reproducibility, deuterium
Paneth, dislocation, Storms, D-D fusion, dislocation annihilation, solid-state nuclear fusion, cold fusion, Miles, helium, Hagelstein, palladium, Lawson criterion, Huizenga's three miracles, atomic-scale confinement, LENR, McKubre, Fleischmann-Pons effect, reproducibility, deuterium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
