Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ESFRI Paper Concept Paper on ERICs

Authors: European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI);

ESFRI Paper Concept Paper on ERICs

Abstract

The European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) legal framework, adopted in 2009, facilitates the establishment and operation of multinational pan-European Research Infrastructures (RIs). Since 2009, the ERIC framework has been successfully adopted by many RIs. Nonetheless, there are some challenges that may prevent the ERIC legal framework to reach its full potential. The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) has convened an "ad-hoc" ESFRI Reflection Group (RG) to review and propose enhancements to the ERIC framework, with the aim of addressing these challenges. This report focuses on strategic (long-term, including those requiring significant legal alterations) and operational (more feasible without any/or extensive legislative changes) recommendations, developed by the RG. The report and its recommendations are addressed to the MS/AC, the EC, and the ERICs. Implementation of the proposed measures, as appropriate, will rest with the competent stakeholders according to their respective mandates. The RG proposes recommendations in three primary areas: Integration of ERIC Elements: Focusing on personnel mobility, national node integration, and legal harmonization to support ERICs' operational effectiveness. Relationships with stakeholders: Tighter coordination with private and non-academic public stakeholders and academia, emphasizing synergy with emerging entities like European Digital Infrastructure Consortia (EDICs) and Technology Infrastructures (TIs), and enhancing international collaboration. Ensuring sustainability of ERICs: Prioritization of financial sustainability to guarantee long-term planning, (technology) upgrades, and strategic expansion of ERICs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average