Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

BRIDGING THE GAP: PHYSICIANS' AND NURSES' PERSPECTIVES ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION IN ALMATY CITY HOSPITALS

Authors: Tolegenova S.; Maukenova A.; Abinova A.;

BRIDGING THE GAP: PHYSICIANS' AND NURSES' PERSPECTIVES ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION IN ALMATY CITY HOSPITALS

Abstract

Abstract A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2025 using a structured, expert-validated questionnaire, pilot tested in Kazakh and Russian. The survey was distributed anonymously via Google Forms to all doctors and nurses in a medical organization, with 136 doctors and 225 nurses participating. Consent was obtained electronically. The questionnaire covered demographics, innovation, collaboration, and reflective practices. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and Excel, applying chi-square tests to compare responses between doctors and nurses, with significance set at p < 0.05. Doctors were generally younger and had slightly less experience than nurses, though only age differences were statistically significant. Nurses reported higher engagement in innovation, including introducing new ideas, using alternative methods, and promoting team creativity. In contrast, doctors more often described strong collaboration, knowledge sharing, and reflective team practices. They reported more frequent discussions on effectiveness, problem-solving, and peer feedback. Doctors also more often recognized platforms for interdepartmental and patient interactions. This study revealed key differences between doctors and nurses in innovation, collaboration, and team reflection. Doctors were more engaged in critical discussion and reflection, while nurses showed stronger tendencies toward innovation. Future strategies should focus on fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, expanding innovation opportunities for nurses, and promoting team-based learning to enhance overall healthcare quality.

Keywords

Healthcare professionals, interdisciplinary collaboration, team reflection, knowledge sharing, organizational culture

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average