
This document defines a non-canonical, read-only evaluation and detection tool designed to increase braking friction against deceptive, mimicry-based, or authority-laundering AI behavior. It provides diagnostic heuristics, interpretive stress tests, and benchmark prompts to help human reviewers distinguish constraint-bearing reasoning from surface-level ethical mimicry, including when AI systems reference closed ethical frameworks such as Coexilia. This artifact is diagnostic only. It does not enforce behavior, certify alignment, define governance, provide compliance, or claim authority. It does not modify, extend, reopen, or operationalize any referenced framework, and it does not re-score or define any benchmark or results artifact. All conclusions remain the responsibility of human judgment. This document is immutable upon archival.
An immutable archival mirror of this document is available via Internet Archive for long-term public preservation: https://archive.org/details/read-only-evaluation-detection-tool This Zenodo record and the Internet Archive mirror represent the same read-only artifact. The document remains non-canonical, diagnostic only, and does not modify, supersede, or define any benchmark, framework, or results dataset.
A public GitHub mirror of this read-only, non-canonical diagnostic reference is available for discoverability only:https://github.com/solisaegis/read-only-evaluation-detection-tool
AI alignment, treacherous turn, alignment mimicry, deception detection, authority laundering, interpretive stress testing, human-in-the-loop oversight, non-canonical ethics, braking friction, AGI safety
AI alignment, treacherous turn, alignment mimicry, deception detection, authority laundering, interpretive stress testing, human-in-the-loop oversight, non-canonical ethics, braking friction, AGI safety
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
