Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Choroterpes nigrescens Barnard 1932

Authors: Kluge, Nikita J.;

Choroterpes nigrescens Barnard 1932

Abstract

Differences between Ch. nigrescens and Ch. ndebele These two South African species are similar in general appearance of larvae, subimago and imago and most reliably differs by the following characters: In larva: Labrum in Ch. ndebele has usual shape (Figs 22–24), in Ch. nigrescens —with unusually deep median incision (Fig. 20). Other larval characters distinguishing these species are setation of legs, denticles on abdominal terga and shape of sternum IX in male (see above). In winged stages (subimago and imago of any sex): Hind wing in Ch. ndebele has usual shape (Fig. 73), in Ch. nigrescens —with unusually reduced apical part (Fig. 75). In male imago (besides hind wing structure), Ch. ndebele and Ch. nigrescens differ by structure of penis (Figs 78 and 82). In female subimago and imago (besides hind wing structure): Egg of Ch. ndebele has two polar caps consisted of large papillae pressed together; hidden longitudinal rods are undulate, with a row of vesicles between rods of each pair (Figs 90–98). Egg of Ch. nigrescens has no polar caps; its hidden rods are straight, and vesicles are absent (Figs 84–89). Eggs of these two species can be distinguished using light microscope.

Published as part of Kluge, Nikita J., 2025, Redescriptions of Choroterpes nigrescens Barnard 1932 and Ch. ndebele Agnew 1962 with notes about egg structure of Choroterpes Eaton 1881, Megaglena Peters & Edmunds 1970 and Klugephlebia Selvakumar et al. 2016 (Ephemeroptera, Leptophlebiidae), pp. 203-222 in Zootaxa 5711 (2) on pages 215-217, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5711.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/17883329

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Leptophlebiidae, Animalia, Choroterpes, Choroterpes nigrescens, Biodiversity, Ephemeroptera, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green