
This paper identifies a fundamental architectural vulnerability in Context Engineering for Large Language Models (LLMs): the introduction of multiple compression layers that compound error rates in complex, tool-augmented systems. We demonstrate that LLMs are inherently lossy compressors, and Context Engineering—through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), tool integration, and memory systems—introduces additional runtime compression layers. Each layer creates compression artifacts that interact with and amplify errors from previous layers, analogous to JPEG re-compression degradation. Key contributions: Formalization of the "Layered Compression Paradox" Mathematical framework for error propagation across compression layers Analysis of five critical failure modes including Contextual Sycophancy Proposal of Neurosymbolic Bypass as an alternative architecture
Context Engineering, Hallucinations, Transformer Architecture, Neurosymbolic AI, LLM Compression, Hallucination, RAG, Cascading Failures
Context Engineering, Hallucinations, Transformer Architecture, Neurosymbolic AI, LLM Compression, Hallucination, RAG, Cascading Failures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
