
This article discusses the idea of integrating the Teaching Excellence Framework as a tool to solve the problem of salary stagnation of faculty members whose focus is on teaching and learning. Currently state universities use a metric-based system in faculty promotion which weighs research more than instruction causing faculty members to experience salary stagnation and slow movement in their promotion. The author discussed the four levels of the framework and highlighted practices from different literature in the country in accordance with these levels. The study used review of related literature and meta-analysis as the primary method in gathering the information needed. The RRL came from published local and international studies, news and report articles posted in websites, and from government documents. The outcomes and discussion followed a format of discussing the level based on the Royal Academy of Engineering who created the framework, followed by practices in the Philippines, the sphere of impact, promotion criteria and the evidence, and a concluding paragraph. An important finding of this study is the adoption of this framework with other universities in the ASEAN region and other international universities. According to these universities they have bridged the gap between research and instruction and leverage the pedagogical strategies of their faculty members. The framework also promoted diversification among faculty members, and a socially justified metric of salary increase and promotion.
state university, political economy, education, salary increase, teaching and learning focused, performance-based promotion, Teaching Excellence Framework, faculty promotion, faculty ranking
state university, political economy, education, salary increase, teaching and learning focused, performance-based promotion, Teaching Excellence Framework, faculty promotion, faculty ranking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
