Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comprehensive Review of Clinical Isolates and Antibiotic Resistance Trends: A One-Year Laboratory-Based Study

Authors: Adarsh Meher;

Comprehensive Review of Clinical Isolates and Antibiotic Resistance Trends: A One-Year Laboratory-Based Study

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major global health challenge, leading to treatment failure, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality. Local hospital antibiograms are essential tools for guiding empirical therapy and strengthening antimicrobial stewardship. Objectives: To determine the distribution of clinical isolates and assess antibiotic resistance patterns over one year in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional laboratory-based study was conducted from September 2024 to August 2025 at a 1500-bedded tertiary care hospital in Central India. All clinical samples from OPD, IPD, and ICUs were processed using standard microbiological methods. Only the first isolate per patient was included. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the VITEK 2 system, interpreted as per CLSI 2024 guidelines, and analyzed using WHONET 2024. Results: Of 1,065 culture-positive samples, 76% were Gram-negative bacteria, with Escherichia coli being the most common isolate, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. High resistance was observed among Gram-negative organisms, while fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin remained effective against urinary E. coli. MRSA prevalence was 58%, with linezolid and vancomycin showing high efficacy. Conclusion: The study demonstrates a high burden of multidrug-resistant pathogens, emphasizing the need for regular antibiogram-based surveillance to support rational antibiotic use.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green