
This study investigated the comparative analysis of the performance and efficiency of heat transfer in parallel flow and counter flow double tube heat exchangers. The research adopted a laboratory-based experimental design in which a concentric tube heat exchanger was operated under controlled conditions to evaluate the influence of flow configuration on thermal performance. Hot and cold water were used as working fluids, and key parameters such as inlet and outlet temperatures, heat transfer rate, log mean temperature difference, overall heat transfer coefficient, and thermal effectiveness were determined for both configurations. The results revealed that the counter flow arrangement consistently exhibited superior thermal performance compared to the parallel flow configuration. This improvement was attributed to the sustained temperature gradient along the length of the heat exchanger, which enhanced heat transfer efficiency and effectiveness. In contrast, the parallel flow configuration showed a rapid reduction in temperature difference, leading to lower heat transfer performance. The findings of the study are consistent with established heat transfer theories and previous empirical studies. Overall, the study concludes that counter flow double tube heat exchangers provide better energy utilization and are more suitable for applications requiring high thermal efficiency.
Double Tube Heat Exchanger; Parallel Flow; Counter Flow; Heat Transfer Performance; Thermal Effectiveness; Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient; Pressure Drop
Double Tube Heat Exchanger; Parallel Flow; Counter Flow; Heat Transfer Performance; Thermal Effectiveness; Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient; Pressure Drop
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
