Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Analgesic Efficacy of Combined Intrarectal Lidocaine Gel with Periprostatic Nerve Block Versus Caudal Block: A Single-Center Experience from A Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Dr. Pranchil Pandey; Dr. Brijesh Tiwari; Dr. Rohan Dwivedi;

Analgesic Efficacy of Combined Intrarectal Lidocaine Gel with Periprostatic Nerve Block Versus Caudal Block: A Single-Center Experience from A Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) is the standard diagnostic procedure for prostate cancer but is frequently associated with patient discomfort. Adequate and balanced anesthesia is essential, especially with extended core biopsy protocols. While caudal block (CB) provides effective analgesia and sphincter relaxation, it may be associated with transient motor weakness. Combined intrarectal lidocaine gel with periprostatic nerve block (cGPNB) has been proposed as an alternative balanced anesthetic technique; however, comparative data remain limited. Our Objectives were to compare the analgesic efficacy, patient tolerability, and subjective preference of cGPNB versus CB during all stages of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in a single-center setting. Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, between October 2022 and October 2024. One hundred patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomized into two groups: Group A received combined intrarectal lidocaine gel with periprostatic nerve block (n=50), and Group B received caudal block (n=50). Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during anesthetic administration; TRUS probe insertion, biopsy needle puncture, and one hour post-procedure. Patient tolerability, willingness for repeat biopsy, and procedure-related complications were recorded. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were comparable between groups. Both techniques provided effective analgesia during biopsy needle puncture and post-procedure periods, with no statistically significant difference in overall pain scores. CB was associated with significantly less pain during probe insertion; however, transient lower limb weakness was observed in a subset of CB patients. Patient willingness for repeat biopsy and overall tolerability were high in both groups, with a trend favoring cGPNB. Conclusion: Combined intrarectal lidocaine gel with periprostatic nerve block provides effective, balanced analgesia throughout TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and is a well-tolerated alternative to caudal block, without associated motor impairment.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!