Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ORIGIN AND SEMANTICS OF LAUDATIVE AND PEJORATIVE CONCEPTS

Authors: Aliyeva I.;

ORIGIN AND SEMANTICS OF LAUDATIVE AND PEJORATIVE CONCEPTS

Abstract

This article examines the origin, semantic structure, and evolutionary patterns of laudative and pejorative concepts in natural language. Through analysis of semantic change processes, particularly amelioration and pejoration, this study explores how words acquire positive or negative connotations over time and what mechanisms drive these transformations. Drawing upon theoretical frameworks from historical linguistics, semantics, and pragmatics, the research demonstrates that laudative and pejorative terms constitute parallel yet asymmetrical linguistic phenomena shaped by sociocultural values, cognitive processes, and communicative needs. The investigation reveals that pejoration occurs more frequently than amelioration, reflecting a general human tendency toward negative bias in language evolution. However, both processes serve essential communicative functions, enabling speakers to express evaluation, construct social identities, and negotiate power relations. Through examination of specific lexical items and their semantic trajectories, this article establishes that the boundary between laudative and pejorative meaning is neither fixed nor universal but rather emerges through complex interactions between linguistic structure, social practice, and cultural ideology. The findings contribute to understanding how evaluative language operates as a dynamic system responsive to changing human attitudes and social conditions.

Keywords

laudative, pejorative, semantic change, amelioration, pejoration, evaluative language, connotation, semantic shift, linguistic evolution, pragmatics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green