
Following a major initiative to enhance Research Data Management (RDM) at UniSC, it became evident that further improvements were necessary. Despite the progress made, many stakeholders remained disengaged, preoccupied, or unaware of their critical roles in supporting RDM across the institution. This highlighted the need for a more structured and inclusive approach to guide future development. To address these challenges and establish clear priorities, the Research Infrastructure Self Evaluation (RISE) workshop was identified as an ideal solution. The RISE workshops offered a systematic method for evaluating and strengthening RDM services. They enabled UniSC to assess its current level of RDM service maturity, identify existing gaps, and highlight key areas for improvement. Additionally, the workshops facilitated the prioritisation of service areas and provided valuable input for developing a roadmap to advance RDM maturity. The workshops were adapted to suit UniSC s context and were instrumental in improving collaboration across multiple directorates while also gathering feedback from researchers. This inclusive approach helped build a shared understanding of RDM needs and fostered stronger institutional engagement. UniSC s project team facilitated the workshops internally, marking a milestone as one of the first Australian universities to independently run the RISE workshop. Previously, these sessions were led by the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC). By taking ownership of the facilitation process, UniSC successfully navigated challenges associated with adapting existing resources and demonstrated leadership in advancing institutional RDM capabilities.
Research Data
Research Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
