Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Developing a Responsible Use of Generative AI Module for Researchers

Authors: Taylor, Shannon;

Developing a Responsible Use of Generative AI Module for Researchers

Abstract

As generative AI tools become increasingly embedded in research workflows and innovative approaches, universities face growing pressure to support researchers in their ethical and responsible use of generative AI (Gen AI) tools. In response to rising uncertainty and numerous inquiries from researchers, a project was initiated to develop an interactive training module tailored specifically to the research community. The module focuses on responsible Gen AI use across disciplines, aiming to foster informed decision-making through a non-prescriptive, reflective approach rather than enforcing simple compliance. To ensure the module was relevant and effective, a program of research and outreach was undertaken to explore existing AI use and perceptions. The objective was to strike a balance between highlighting opportunities and addressing risks. Stakeholder consultations and focus groups helped uncover knowledge gaps, areas of uncertainty, and real-world concerns. Researchers consistently expressed a need for practical, non-technical guidance to navigate legal, ethical, and reputational risks. Feedback was gathered through three iterative rounds involving both Higher Degree by Research students and academic staff. Key outcomes of the project included not only the development of the training module, but also the creation of practical institutional resources and guidelines identified as necessary by participants. This presentation will outline the development process, challenges, and strategies for creating effective, researcher-led training in response to emerging technologies. The model presented offers a framework that can be adapted by other institutions in similar contexts. ?

Related Organizations
Keywords

Tools, Research Software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green