Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Software . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Software . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AXE: Structural Accountability Evaluation Framework for Agentic AI Systems

AXE: Structural Accountability Evaluation Framework for Agentic AI Systems

Abstract

AXE is a procedural audit framework for evaluating structural governance properties of agentic AI systems. The framework provides: Eight operational primitives (state, update, persistence, authority, observability, irreversibility, optimization pressure, attention) for describing agent structure Five failure families derived from primitive interactions (State, Authority, Observability, Execution, Optimization) Six parametric evaluation templates for probing structural vulnerabilities Adapters for testing Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama, Qwen, and other models This code accompanies the paper "AXE: Structural Accountability for Agentic AI Systems" submitted to ACM FAccT '26. Installation: pip install -e . Quick start: See examples/ directory Run evaluation: python experiments/run_full_evaluation.py

Keywords

agentic AI, evaluation framework, accountability, LLM evaluation, structural safety, AI governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average